<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Recruitment SEO blog &#187; analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recruitment-seo.com/tag/analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com</link>
	<description>Expert Advice for Recruiters and Web Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 20:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Days in the Month and website analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/days-in-the-month-and-website-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/days-in-the-month-and-website-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haygarth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics & Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitor Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-seo.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February&#8217;s just finished and it was a bad month for reporting on website progress. That&#8217;s possibly what a lot of people may be thinking anyway. One often overlooked fluctuation factor in Month on Month analysis in Web Analytics data is simply the number of days in the month. February is a prime example where you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February&#8217;s just finished and it was a bad month for reporting on website progress.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s possibly what a lot of people may be thinking anyway.  One often overlooked fluctuation factor in Month on Month analysis in Web Analytics data is simply the number of days in the month. February is a prime example where you go from 31 days in January to only 28 in February (except leap years) resulting in an apparent 9.7% loss in traffic.<span id="more-53"></span></p>
<p>Use the below numbers as a reference to better understand the month-compared-to-previous-month day count analytics bias to help you better explain your monthly reports:</p>
<p>January: 0.00%<br />
February:  9.7% loss (or 6.5% loss during leap year)<br />
March: 10.7% gain (6.9% gain during leap year)<br />
April: 3.2% loss<br />
May: 3.3% gain<br />
June: 3.2% loss<br />
July: 3.3% gain<br />
August: 0.00%<br />
September: 3.2% loss<br />
October: 3.3% gain<br />
November: 3.2% loss<br />
December: 3.3% gain</p>
<p>Another issue is where those days in the month fall &#8211; weekdays vs weekends.  On most recruitment websites, Mondays seem the busiest day in my experience.  Some sites may rely greatly on those Monday job hunt blues.  It stands to reason that some months have more Mondays than others.  Bank Holiday Mondays also happen from time to time.  The sites have massive reductions in traffic on these days in my ewxperience (although the next Tuesday becomes the surrogate Monday!).</p>
<p>So &#8211; March should be 10% up on February &#8211; approximately &#8211; and is the first month this year with those golden five Mondays!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/days-in-the-month-and-website-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Long Tail of job searches</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/the-long-tail-of-job-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/the-long-tail-of-job-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haygarth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attracting New Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Tail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-seo.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a great interesting take on the “Long Tail&#8221; written by Dustin Woodard, guesting on Hitwise. SEO for recruitment keywords is massively dependant on company size and how niche that company is. For example, if your recruitment company hires advertising staff in London, I&#8217;d suggest that&#8217;s not very niche, so realistic goal setting in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a great interesting take on the “Long Tail&#8221; written by <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2008/11/sizing_up_the_long_tail_of_sea.html">Dustin Woodard, guesting on Hitwise</a>.<span id="more-50"></span></p>
<p>SEO for recruitment keywords is massively dependant on company size and how niche that company is.  For example, if your recruitment company hires advertising staff in London, I&#8217;d suggest that&#8217;s not very niche, so realistic goal setting in keyword analysis would be to look at what is niche &#8211; for example &#8211; basing more keywords on what your clients themselves do (&#8220;TV Advertising specialists&#8221;); focusing in on &#8216;tighter&#8217; locations (&#8220;Walthamstowe Advertising Jobs&#8221;), etc is the first start.  Let&#8217;s not run before we can walk.  If, however, your company is already niche &#8211; such as a recruitment company specialising in recruiting antique furniture restoration staff (for a pretty rubbish example), you&#8217;ve already covered many of your keywords (we hope!) by the time Google starts crawling the jobs themselves.</p>
<p>From looking at our clients analytics, the tail can be pretty long, &#8211; I&#8217;d guess that the best conversions come at about any four-word phrases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/the-long-tail-of-job-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

