<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Recruitment SEO blog &#187; Job Aggregators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recruitment-seo.com/category/job-aggregators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com</link>
	<description>Expert Advice for Recruiters and Web Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tweet your jobs&#8230; the easy way</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/tweet-your-jobs-the-easy-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/tweet-your-jobs-the-easy-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haygarth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-seo.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve seen so many articles recently about complex mothods of getting your jobs &#8216;fed&#8217; onto Twitter.
It&#8217;s so simple and there are a few sites / providers out there with vested interests giving people all manner of complex advice about how to automatically display your jobs on Twitter.
It&#8217;s so simple to do and I feel the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen so many articles recently about complex mothods of getting your jobs &#8216;fed&#8217; onto Twitter.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so simple and there are a few sites / providers out there with vested interests giving people all manner of complex advice about how to automatically display your jobs on Twitter.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so simple to do and I feel the overpowering urge to tell you how before someone else tells you a more complex way.</p>
<ol>
<li>Get the URL of your jobs RSS feed <small><em>no RSS feed?  Get a <a href="http://www.fxrecruiter.co.uk">new recruitment website</a>!</em></small></li>
<li>Create the Twitter account that you want to use (five minutes&#8217; job!) to display the jobs</li>
<li>Login to that Twitter account</li>
<li>Go to <a href="http://www.pingvine.com">pingvine.com</a> or <a href="http://www.twitterfeed.com">twitterfeed.com</a> and submit the RSS feed (i.e., paste it in), and authenticate it.</li>
<li>Bingo&#8230; one more channel to get your jobs to the world &#8211; using the world&#8217;s fastest-growing search engine &#8211; Twitter.</li>
</ol>
<p>Oh&#8230; and don&#8217;t forget the bit that people so often miss out on&#8230; PRMOTE YOUR CHANNELS &#8211; make sure people know they can digest your content in whatever way suits <span style="text-decoration: underline;">them</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/tweet-your-jobs-the-easy-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a job search engine?  Beyond Google and Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/what-is-a-job-search-engine-beyond-google-and-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/what-is-a-job-search-engine-beyond-google-and-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haygarth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attracting New Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goal Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trovit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitor Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workcircle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-seo.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditional organic SEO means (to put things simply) focus on mainly Google (organic) results and, if you have time, Yahoo (organic) results.  It&#8217;s no wonder &#8211; if someone wants to find something on the web, we all know where people go first &#8211; it makes sense to focus your resources there.   But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional organic SEO means (to put things simply) focus on mainly Google (organic) results and, if you have time, Yahoo (organic) results.  It&#8217;s no wonder &#8211; if someone wants to find something on the web, we all know where people go first &#8211; it makes sense to focus your resources there.   But what happens when they discover a &#8216;new&#8217; search engine?<span id="more-84"></span></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; no-one&#8217;s about to oust Google from the top spot, but search patterns show that when people find a site that delivers the content they&#8217;re after, they go to that site.  I&#8217;ll give you an example.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a cyclist, and love to spend all my <em>hard-earned</em> on things for bikes.  At first, when I was getting used to shopping online, I went to Google and searched for what I was after.  Simple pattern &#8211; people do it.  But then, after a while, I found that only two websites from the Google results suited me &#8211; and they way I wanted to shop.  Now, it&#8217;s very rare that I Google for bike stuff &#8211; I&#8217;ve been <em>brought in to the brand</em> by <a href="http://www.wiggle.co.uk">Wiggle</a> and <a href="http://www.chainreactioncycles.com">Chainreactioncycles</a>.  These are &#8220;my&#8221; new search engines.  Job done for those two companies.</p>
<p>Back to recruitment&#8230; using that example.  How many candidates search for &#8220;London Marketing Jobs&#8221; every week on Google?  I&#8217;m not sure ( I wish I had that level of insight!) but what I do know is that all of the results on the first page are sites with their <strong>own</strong> job search engine&#8230;  <cite>www.utalkmarketing.com  &#8211; </cite><cite>www.brandrepublic.com &#8211; </cite><cite>www.regananddean.co.uk &#8211; </cite><cite>www.marketingweek.co.uk &#8211; </cite><cite>www.londonjobs.co.uk</cite> etc.   You can probably see where I&#8217;m heading with this.  The point is, when a candidate finds a site that delivers the search results that they want, will they move to that site&#8217;s brand and away from Google?</p>
<h4>So what can we learn from this?</h4>
<ol>
<li>Let&#8217;s not get carried away &#8211; and remember that Google&#8217;s own guidelines on optimisation are healthy as standalone advice.  A good page structure and page meta are helpful in all sorts of ways &#8211; not just getting to the top in Google</li>
<li> Make sure your job search works well for people.  You&#8217;d be surprised how many internal site searches don&#8217;t deliver what people need or expect.</li>
<li>Use Aggregators.  It stands to reason that these services -<br />
1job.co.uk,<br />
trovit.co.uk,<br />
indeed.co.uk,<br />
workcircle.co.uk,<br />
indeed.co.uk<br />
&#8230; all carry lots of might &#8211; and candidates are more likely to use <strong>them</strong> as their job search engine</li>
<li>Be innovative.  Putting your jobs on Facebook?  Tweeting your jobs on Twitter?  Why not?  It&#8217;s minimal effort and these are two big search channels.</li>
<li>You may only get a few chances to grab that candidate in Google, so do keyword research and get some relevant jobs <strong>and</strong> <strong>other content </strong>on your site.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/featured-articles/what-is-a-job-search-engine-beyond-google-and-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workcircle endorses keyword-rich URLs with microsites</title>
		<link>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/job-aggregators/workcircle-keyword-rich-urls-with-microsites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/job-aggregators/workcircle-keyword-rich-urls-with-microsites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haygarth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Job Aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workcircle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recruitment-seo.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article reproduced in part from Onrec, shows me an interesting, often debated concept &#8211; that of keywords in your domain name.  Keywords in domain names have very little importance in actual ranking calculations &#8211; that’s been the case for years now. The positive effects people see are a consequence of sites linking to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article reproduced in part from <a href="http://www.onrec.com">Onrec</a>, shows me an interesting, often debated concept &#8211; that of keywords in your domain name.  Keywords in domain names have very little importance in actual ranking calculations &#8211; that’s been the case for years now. The positive effects people see are a consequence of sites linking to the domain using the URL as anchor text &#8211; link text containing keywords is what helps the domain rank, not the actual appearance of the keyword in the domain name.  Our own blog is a great example of this.  Google may well ignore the fact that &#8216;recruitment seo&#8217; is in the domain name, but if people link to us, the anchor text is highly likely to be &#8216;Recruitment SEO&#8217; &#8211; a valuable keyword to this site (since that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s about!).<span id="more-33"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Leading jobs aggregator <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.workcircle.co.uk/">Workcircle</a> has launched 11 new sector job sites in the UK under their &#8216;ABC&#8217; brand.</p>
<p>This represents Workcircle&#8217;s most aggressive expansion yet. Workcircle CEO Simon Appleton says, &#8220;Now more than ever, jobseekers are looking for the best way to find a job quickly, and job advertisers are looking for the most cost-effective way to attract the right candidates. Workcircle addresses both these needs, and we&#8217;re building on the massive success of our generalist UK site to launch our first wave of new niche sites&#8221;.</p>
<p>The sector sites, launched under Workcircle&#8217;s sister &#8216;ABC&#8217; brand include:</p>
<p>www.abcitjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcmarketingjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcsalesjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcengineeringjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abccateringjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcfinancialjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcadminjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abclegaljobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcretailjobs.co.uk<br />
www.abchealthcarejobs.co.uk<br />
www.abcconstructionjobs.co.uk</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recruitment-seo.com/job-aggregators/workcircle-keyword-rich-urls-with-microsites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
